I love God and my religion but dislike when fellow-Christians spread hate by writing blogs that are pure conjecture, incorrect and blasphemous as is What is a Raver, written by Tyson Bowers III. You may view this article in its entirety at http://christwire.org/2011/06/what-is-a-raver/ While surfing Facebook, I came across a link to a Christian website with an all-inclusive blog-post about Ravers and the origins of the Underground, Rave network. In short, the author, Tyson Bowers III, slams this art of perfection by portraying a one-sided argument against fellow Ravers that gives Christianity a bad name. Not only are his views biased and inaccurate, they are also weak, ungodly and overly subjective.
The Origins of Rave Culture
He begins the article by attributing the historical origin of Raves to Nazi Germany. This is incorrect sir. If he’d paid attention in history class or did his research he would have known that Raves go back to B.C. times when the Pagans partied out to Dionysus—the god of raves, wine and ecstasy. You can’t blame all bad things on the Nazis, even if you find that a convenient outlet for your slanderous attacks.
Next, Bowers (the author) again attempts to portray Ravers as dirty by saying: “… [Ravers] dance while they shove pills of ecstasy drugs up their rectums and suck on cherry flavored ring pops.” Now, I can’t tell here if he’s being literal or not, but I do know this, I’ve been to many thousands of Raves and I’ve known maybe two or three Ravers who have actually shoved an ecstasy pill “up their rectum.” Sorry to say, it doesn’t happen that way. The way I see it at least, it is a waste of a good pill, despicable and very inconvenient to plug pills; it also causes severe medical problems (as you could imagine!). In my experiences, I’ve learned that 90% of true Ravers are smart, very smart, and would never stick a pill up their asses. Sorry!
Bowers continues, having the audacity to blame an influx of abortions in Russia to Ravers as well. Why not, right? Wrong! Well, here’s his direct quote: “These phase in UK history is also known as the ‘Abortion Plague,’ as the rate of abortions shot up to 74% in girls from the ages of 14 to 19.” First off, learn how to spell; “this” is spelled t-h-i-s, not t-h-e-s-e. Okay? Second, you didn’t even cite a legit source for this stunning, speculative and stupid statistic. And the reason for that is, you couldn’t locate one!
Bowers again oversteps the boundaries of rhetoric by claiming that “Raves didn’t become popular in the U.S. until the LATE 1990s.” Wrong again. Raves actually declined in popularity in the late 1990s. They were most popular in the EARLY 1990s but dropped off in the LATE 1990s! Get your facts straight. And, by the way, “Happy Hardcore” music played a role in this, but it had more to do with eclectic, underground music that you wouldn’t recognize if it slapped you in the face.
Blame the Music and Ecstasy!
Bowers goes on to claim…
“Rave DJs (Drug Jockeys as he refers to them as) knew the American’s loved more of a ‘pop’ sound and developed this music to entice American’s to come to their hidden desert parties and get them hooked on the newly developed drug MDMA, also know as ecstasy or “The fuzzy sex pill”. The first popular Happy Hardcore song in American was called “Groove is in the Heart” by a Los Angeles band named ‘Deee-Lite.’
Wow! All this guy’s misspellings are distracting, I know, but this direct quote speaks for itself. He tries to bash DJs by calling them “Drug Jockeys.” The truth is however, I’ve met more Ravers that would want to be a DJ than would want to be pro athletes. As a Christian myself, I wouldn’t go as far to say, “God is a DJ,” but the truth be told, this is how all music lovers look at good DJs; not just Ravers. Again overly biased and subjective, Bowers joins the blame game by attributing the popularity of Raves to MDMA. On this, I have to say, he actually may be on to something. MDMA, a derivative of methamphetamine, does contribute to the influx of Raving, yes. However, I may be in denial here myself, but come on; it is severely hard to get “hooked” on ecstasy—on a physical level. That’s why I like to say ecstasy is bittersweet, collateral damage that comes with the territory of being a Raver.
Moving on…Bowers returns to the “all about the Ecstasy” argument with the outlandish statement that the drug turns these kids into “raging” sex fiends, wherein they’d have 12-17 sexual partners in one night. Isn’t this just a tiny bit blown out of proportion here? Look, I’m an industry-expert in ecstasy, so I’d be the first to know if the drug turns one into a hyper-sexual dynamo with 17 partners. Maybe, Bowers, could this be wishful thinking? Is say so because, I’ve taken more than my share of ecstasy (which I am not advocating here!), and I’ve had 1-2 sexual partners (total) over the span of my near 20 years raving. An exception to the rule? Maybe. But there is no way you can attribute 17 partners a night to Raves, or even drugs. Anyone with half a brain knows this, but you, the expert does not? Why is that?
Bowers reaches more when he blames the DJ for giving names to the different types of ecstasy. For my readers here who don’t understand, here’s how what I like to call “branding ecstasy” works: ecstasy comes in pill form, all different sizes, colors and shapes. Unlike its despicable sister drug, crystal methamphetamine, ecstasy is unique in that there are several types or brands. For example, Blue Superman, Mints, Pink Snowman…well, you get the idea. The dealers (not DJs!) do this of course for the same reason Pepsi has so many different types of soft-drinks—sales, sales, sales! My point here is that there must be a distinction between DJs and drug dealers, because they are not one-and-the-same. Are there DJs who also sell and/or promote ecstasy? Yes. Are most DJs drug dealers? Absolutely not. Get it straight, sir!
Candy Kids
Next, of course, Bowers begins his attack on “Candy” kids. Some of his hate-filled characterizations on this subculture include:
Candy kids wear bright clothing and beads, and you can recognize them because they all wear ring pops on their fingers.
Well, I was one, a candy kid, not a ring pop, and I never saw a problem with wearing colorful clothes. Sure, the beads (which ravers call kandy) were a bit eccentric, but what’s wrong with this type of artistic expression?
“Each candy kid collects beads, these beads are signs of how many bi-sexual sex orgies they have been apart of.”
What in the world is he talking about here? First of all, beads aka: kandy, have really nothing to do with orgies. The beads, which are usually worn as bracelets by ravers of both sexes, symbolize memories that full under the raver mission statement of Peace, Love, Unity and Respect (or PLUR).
“A candy kid is also know[n] for their “glow stick” skills and often battle with other candy kids to see who can do the better light show dance. Most battles are for drugs or to win a sex session with the other crews…”
Again, Bowers could be on to something here even if he is dead wrong. I am the king of glowsticks (or so I like to tell myself that), have battled many different people and it’s never been about winning any type of prize let alone sex or drugs! True ravers battle for platonic love and positive vibes and instead buy their drugs like everyone else in society. With all the battles I’ve won over the years, I’d probably have a metropolis of families had sex been a prize for winning. It just doesn’t work that way.
“… [A] violent clan of the bunch, with their afro-angry drum beats and Zulu dance moves. Mostly made up of “Yellows” and blacks, Jungle Lists go to these parties to stir up trouble, cause fights and rob other ravers. This should not be a surprise as we know communist Asians and blacks due the same thing in American society.”
Even though Bowers exposes himself here as racist (big surprise, right?), he is way off in this claim. Ravers are targeted for robberies more than other party populations, sure; but it has way more to do with the Ravers’ passive views towards violence and wanting to be peaceful to their communities than their races! Also, ravers often have divergent views from that of their police counterparts. And I have no idea why.
To Sum…
Bowers ends his insane, delusional depictions of innocent kids by characterizing another rave sub-culture (PLUR babies) as:
“… rich suburban white kids who hide their homosexual activities from their parents and live it up at local raver gay bars.”
Now, come on. Are you serious here? Do you expect my readers to believe they’d want to meet you, Mr. Bowers, in a local gay bar? You’re a Christian and I respect that, but you’re a loser; you spread hate through one of the most one-sided, offbeat blogs I’ve ever read. And aside from all the grammatical errors, your research lacks merit, your statistics are inaccurate, and your opinions are pathetic! And yes! I’m a Christian, as are many of my Raver friends, and we’d all rather be the lowest class of raver than the upper class of hater…like yourself.
Peace.
Written by Just Jay et al.
Sources: Bowers, T. III. “What is a Raver.” http://christwire.org/2011/06/what-is-a-raver/